Comments:

Sam - 2006-09-15 08:19:47
Interesting that you would use the opinion of one person to interpret the ideology of a whole political party. Also interesting is that you would choose liberal leaning, framed questions to decide who should get to vote for our President. If I?m not mistaken, this is a very common practice in many dictatorships. Interesting indeed.
-------------------------------
jt76 - 2006-09-15 09:42:51
The point was that SHE was identifying herself as a Republican and insinuated that what made her so was her belief that God wanted Bush in the Whitehouse. As far as the 'questions' go, a huge # of people were lead to believe that we invaded Iraq because there were tied between Saddam and Bin Laden when there were not. It was meant more of a joke. And for the record, since you obviously think I am a 'liberal', I would have voted for McCain had he not been smeared out of the republican primary in 2000 by Bush. And Bush is NOT a Republican- at least not in the way I define the party. How can someone who is suppose to be for limited government preside of the largest increase in Government since the Great Depression?
-------------------------------
Erika - 2006-09-15 15:10:15
creamy vs crunchy is a very big deal. How dare you make this seem as if it should be trivial! you heartless commie bastard! ;)
-------------------------------
jes - 2006-09-17 09:26:57
BLARGITY BLARGITY BLARG!!!! I just watnted to pretend yell at you like Sam, and I am too sleepy to come up with real words. BLARG!!!!!
-------------------------------

add your comment:

your name:
your email:
your url:

back to the entry - Diaryland